Burkina Faso vs Croatia: Rubber — Import Quantity
Rubber — Import Quantity over time
- Burkina Faso
- Croatia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 971 t against 742 t in Burkina Faso, a difference of 229 t.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.3 times Burkina Faso's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 68th and Croatia ranks 65th of 149 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 94.88 t | 823.62 t | 728.75 t | Croatia |
| 2000s | 688.2 t | 1,203 t | 514.9 t | Croatia |
| 2010s | 687.25 t | 1,201 t | 513.5 t | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rubber — import quantity, Burkina Faso or Croatia?
- Croatia, at 971 t against 742 t in Burkina Faso as of 2013.
- What is the difference in rubber — import quantity between Burkina Faso and Croatia?
- 229 t, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Croatia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
- How do Burkina Faso and Croatia rank globally for rubber — import quantity?
- Burkina Faso ranks 68th and Croatia ranks 65th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rubber — Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.