Chile vs Serbia and Montenegro: Rubber — Export Quantity
Rubber — Export Quantity over time
- Chile
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 278 t against 229 t in Chile, a difference of 49 t.
That makes Serbia and Montenegro's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 52nd and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 50th of 117 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Serbia and Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 51.5 t | 7.5 t | 44 t | Chile |
| 2000s | 91.83 t | 70.17 t | 21.67 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rubber — export quantity, Chile or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Serbia and Montenegro, at 278 t against 229 t in Chile as of 2005.
- What is the difference in rubber — export quantity between Chile and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 49 t, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Chile and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for rubber — export quantity?
- Chile ranks 52nd and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 50th of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rubber — Export Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.