Fiji vs Kyrgyzstan: Rubber — Domestic supply quantity
Rubber — Domestic supply quantity over time
- Fiji
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 2 t against 1 t in Fiji, a difference of 1 t.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 2.0 times Fiji's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 135th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 132nd of 151 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14 t | 1.12 t | 12.88 t | Fiji |
| 2000s | 5.1 t | 8.1 t | 3 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | -9.5 t | 1 t | 10.5 t | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rubber — domestic supply quantity, Fiji or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 2 t against 1 t in Fiji as of 2013.
- What is the difference in rubber — domestic supply quantity between Fiji and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1 t, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Kyrgyzstan?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
- How do Fiji and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for rubber — domestic supply quantity?
- Fiji ranks 135th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 132nd of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rubber — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.