Australia vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries: Rape and Mustardseed — Processing

Australia
811,110 t
in 2013
Low Income Food Deficit Countries
7.99 million t
in 2013
Australia rank
13th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries rank
10th

Rape and Mustardseed — Processing over time

  • Australia
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M196119872013

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries currently reports 7.99 million t against 811,110 t in Australia, a difference of 7.18 million t.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries's figure about 9.8 times Australia's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 13th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries ranks 10th of 70 countries.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Low Income Food Deficit Countries Difference Ahead
1960s 1,008 t 1.54 million t 1.54 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries
1970s 21,939 t 2.11 million t 2.09 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries
1980s 45,043 t 3.01 million t 2.96 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries
1990s 233,257 t 5.58 million t 5.35 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries
2000s 457,874 t 6.83 million t 6.37 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries
2010s 762,993 t 7.86 million t 7.09 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rape and mustardseed — processing, Australia or Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries, at 7.99 million t against 811,110 t in Australia as of 2013.
What is the difference in rape and mustardseed — processing between Australia and Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
7.18 million t, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Australia and Low Income Food Deficit Countries rank globally for rape and mustardseed — processing?
Australia ranks 13th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries ranks 10th of 70 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rape and Mustardseed — Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries: Rape and Mustardseed — Processing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-and-mustardseed-processing/australia/low-income-food-deficit-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-and-mustardseed-processing/australia/low-income-food-deficit-countries/">Australia vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries: Rape and Mustardseed — Processing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rape and Mustardseed — Processing
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
98 places, 4,371 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.