Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: Rape and Mustardseed β€” Processing

Australia
811,110 t
in 2013
Australia and New Zealand
811,110 t
in 2013
Australia rank
13th
Australia and New Zealand rank
13th

Rape and Mustardseed β€” Processing over time

  • Australia
  • Australia and New Zealand
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119872013

How they compare

Australia currently reports 811,110 t against 811,110 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0 t.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 13th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th of 69 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Australia and New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 1,008 t 1,008 t 0 t β€”
1970s 21,939 t 21,939 t 0 t β€”
1980s 45,043 t 45,043 t 0 t β€”
1990s 233,257 t 233,257 t 0 t β€”
2000s 457,874 t 457,874 t 0 t β€”
2010s 762,993 t 762,993 t 0 t β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rape and mustardseed β€” processing, Australia or Australia and New Zealand?
Australia, at 811,110 t against 811,110 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2013.
What is the difference in rape and mustardseed β€” processing between Australia and Australia and New Zealand?
0 t, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Australia and New Zealand?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Australia and Australia and New Zealand rank globally for rape and mustardseed β€” processing?
Australia ranks 13th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th of 69 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rape and Mustardseed β€” Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: Rape and Mustardseed β€” Processing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-and-mustardseed-processing/australia/australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-and-mustardseed-processing/australia/australia-and-new-zealand/">Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: Rape and Mustardseed β€” Processing</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rape and Mustardseed β€” Processing
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
98 places, 4,371 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.