Land locked developing countries vs Zimbabwe: Rape and Mustardseed β€” Other uses

Land locked developing countries
92 t
in 2013
Zimbabwe
41 t
in 2013
Land locked developing countries rank
5th
Zimbabwe rank
21st

Rape and Mustardseed β€” Other uses over time

  • Land locked developing countries
  • Zimbabwe
0100200300400196119872013

How they compare

Land locked developing countries currently reports 92 t against 41 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 51 t.

That makes Land locked developing countries's figure about 2.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Land locked developing countries ranks 5th and Zimbabwe ranks 21st of 10 regions.

Land locked developing countries has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land locked developing countries Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 0 t 0 t β€”
1970s 0 t 0 t 0 t β€”
1980s 0 t 0 t 0 t β€”
1990s 38.1 t 26.2 t 11.9 t Land locked developing countries
2000s 129.9 t 15.6 t 114.3 t Land locked developing countries
2010s 92.5 t 36.25 t 56.25 t Land locked developing countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rape and mustardseed β€” other uses, Land locked developing countries or Zimbabwe?
Land locked developing countries, at 92 t against 41 t in Zimbabwe as of 2013.
What is the difference in rape and mustardseed β€” other uses between Land locked developing countries and Zimbabwe?
51 t, with Land locked developing countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land locked developing countries and Zimbabwe?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Land locked developing countries and Zimbabwe rank globally for rape and mustardseed β€” other uses?
Land locked developing countries ranks 5th and Zimbabwe ranks 21st of 10 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rape and Mustardseed β€” Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land locked developing countries vs Zimbabwe: Rape and Mustardseed β€” Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-and-mustardseed-other-uses-non-food/land-locked-developing-countries/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-and-mustardseed-other-uses-non-food/land-locked-developing-countries/zimbabwe/">Land locked developing countries vs Zimbabwe: Rape and Mustardseed β€” Other uses</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rape and Mustardseed β€” Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
72 places, 3,660 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.