Australia and New Zealand vs Denmark: Rape and Mustard Cake — Feed

Australia and New Zealand
428,858 t
in 2013
Denmark
480,000 t
in 2013
Australia and New Zealand rank
14th
Denmark rank
12th

Rape and Mustard Cake — Feed over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Denmark
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119872013

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 480,000 t against 428,858 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 51,142 t.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Denmark ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 14th and Denmark ranks 12th of 99 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Denmark in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Denmark Difference Ahead
1960s 572.11 t 15,667 t 15,095 t Denmark
1970s 12,577 t 60,100 t 47,523 t Denmark
1980s 25,834 t 215,734 t 189,900 t Denmark
1990s 130,326 t 425,164 t 294,838 t Denmark
2000s 258,506 t 311,440 t 52,934 t Denmark
2010s 414,196 t 397,850 t 16,346 t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rape and mustard cake — feed, Australia and New Zealand or Denmark?
Denmark, at 480,000 t against 428,858 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2013.
What is the difference in rape and mustard cake — feed between Australia and New Zealand and Denmark?
51,142 t, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Denmark?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Denmark rank globally for rape and mustard cake — feed?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 14th and Denmark ranks 12th of 99 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rape and Mustard Cake — Feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Denmark: Rape and Mustard Cake — Feed. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-and-mustard-cake-feed/australia-and-new-zealand/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rape-and-mustard-cake-feed/australia-and-new-zealand/denmark/">Australia and New Zealand vs Denmark: Rape and Mustard Cake — Feed</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rape and Mustard Cake — Feed
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
134 places, 6,219 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.