Caribbean vs Solomon Islands: Prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — Value over time
- Caribbean
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 27 % against 16.7 % in Caribbean, a difference of 10.3 %.
That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.6 times Caribbean's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Caribbean ahead.
Caribbean ranks 9th and Solomon Islands ranks 11th of 28 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Caribbean averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.8 % | 13.07 % | 3.73 % | Caribbean |
| 2010s | 13.38 % | 20.81 % | 7.43 % | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 16.3 % | 27.07 % | 10.77 % | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — value, Caribbean or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 27 % against 16.7 % in Caribbean as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — value between Caribbean and Solomon Islands?
- 10.3 %, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Solomon Islands?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Caribbean and Solomon Islands rank globally for prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — value?
- Caribbean ranks 9th and Solomon Islands ranks 11th of 28 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.