Brazil vs Malaysia: Prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — Value over time
- Brazil
- Malaysia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 2.7 % against 2.7 % in Malaysia, a difference of 0 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 100th and Malaysia ranks 100th of 116 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.93 % | 3.24 % | 2.69 % | Brazil |
| 2010s | 2.75 % | 3.05 % | 0.3 % | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — value, Brazil or Malaysia?
- Brazil, at 2.7 % against 2.7 % in Malaysia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — value between Brazil and Malaysia?
- 0 %, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Malaysia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Malaysia rank globally for prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — value?
- Brazil ranks 100th and Malaysia ranks 100th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.