Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Nigeria: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
61.8 %
in 2023
Nigeria
76.9 %
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
5th
Nigeria rank
8th

Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Nigeria
020406080201420182023

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 76.9 % against 61.8 % in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 15.1 %.

That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.2 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th and Nigeria ranks 8th of 37 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Nigeria in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Nigeria Difference Ahead
2010s 56.22 % 47.15 % 9.07 % Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 61.55 % 74.22 % 12.67 % Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 76.9 % against 61.8 % in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Nigeria?
15.1 %, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Nigeria?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Nigeria rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th and Nigeria ranks 8th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult population (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Nigeria: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-moderate-or-severe-food-insecurity-in-the-female-adult-population-percent-3/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-moderate-or-severe-food-insecurity-in-the-female-adult-population-percent-3/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/nigeria/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Nigeria: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the female adult population (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
169 places, 1,581 data points, 2014–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.