Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mauritius: Prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — Value

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
14.7 %
in 2020
Mauritius
18.7 %
in 2020
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
8th
Mauritius rank
10th

Prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — Value over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Mauritius
05101520200020102020

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 18.7 % against 14.7 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 4 %.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.3 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 8th and Mauritius ranks 10th of 36 groups.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Mauritius Difference Ahead
2000s 15.7 % 19.5 % 3.8 % Mauritius
2010s 15.08 % 18.95 % 3.87 % Mauritius
2020s 14.7 % 18.7 % 4 % Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — value, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 18.7 % against 14.7 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2020.
What is the difference in prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — value between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mauritius?
4 %, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mauritius?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mauritius rank globally for prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — value?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 8th and Mauritius ranks 10th of 36 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mauritius: Prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-low-birthweight-percent-value/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-low-birthweight-percent-value/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/mauritius/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mauritius: Prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of low birthweight (percent) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
198 places, 4,158 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.