Guyana vs Madagascar: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)
Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) over time
- Guyana
- Madagascar
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 37.5 % against 37.2 % in Madagascar, a difference of 0.3 %.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Guyana has been ahead every year.
Guyana ranks 34th and Madagascar ranks 36th of 177 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.33 % | 34.47 % | 7.86 % | Guyana |
| 2010s | 37.26 % | 33.27 % | 3.99 % | Guyana |
| 2020s | 37.25 % | 36.15 % | 1.1 % | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years), Guyana or Madagascar?
- Guyana, at 37.5 % against 37.2 % in Madagascar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) between Guyana and Madagascar?
- 0.3 %, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Madagascar?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Guyana and Madagascar rank globally for prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)?
- Guyana ranks 34th and Madagascar ranks 36th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) (percent) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.