Eritrea vs Namibia: Permanent cropland
Eritrea
0.0%
in 2023
Namibia
0.0%
in 2023
Eritrea rank
192nd
Namibia rank
195th
Permanent cropland over time
- Eritrea
- Namibia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Namibia, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 192nd and Namibia ranks 195th of 201 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher permanent cropland, Eritrea or Namibia?
- Eritrea, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in permanent cropland between Eritrea and Namibia?
- 0.0%, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Namibia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Namibia rank globally for permanent cropland?
- Eritrea ranks 192nd and Namibia ranks 195th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Permanent cropland (% of land area). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Permanent cropland is land cultivated with crops that occupy the land for long periods and need not be replanted after each harvest, such as cocoa, coffee, and rubber. This category includes land under flowering shrubs, fruit trees, nut trees, and vines, but excludes land under trees grown for wood or timber.