Botswana vs Eritrea: Permanent cropland
Botswana
2,000 hectares
in 2011
Eritrea
2,000 hectares
in 2011
Botswana rank
50th
Eritrea rank
50th
Permanent cropland over time
- Botswana
- Eritrea
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 2,000 hectares against 2,000 hectares in Eritrea, a difference of 0 hectares.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 50th and Eritrea ranks 50th of 52 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,000 hectares | 2,000 hectares | 1,000 hectares | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 1,450 hectares | 2,400 hectares | 950 hectares | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 2,000 hectares | 2,000 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher permanent cropland, Botswana or Eritrea?
- Botswana, at 2,000 hectares against 2,000 hectares in Eritrea as of 2011.
- What is the difference in permanent cropland between Botswana and Eritrea?
- 0 hectares, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Eritrea?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Botswana and Eritrea rank globally for permanent cropland?
- Botswana ranks 50th and Eritrea ranks 50th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as Permanent cropland (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Permanent cropland is land cultivated with crops that occupy the land for long periods and need not be replanted after each harvest, such as cocoa, coffee, and rubber. This category includes land under flowering shrubs, fruit trees, nut trees, and vines, but excludes land under trees grown for wood or timber.