Eswatini vs Greenland: Percentage of population using at least basic sanitation services
Percentage of population using at least basic sanitation services over time
- Eswatini
- Greenland
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 64 % against 62 % in Greenland, a difference of 2 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Greenland ahead.
Eswatini ranks 141st and Greenland ranks 143rd of 186 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Greenland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 60 % | 62 % | 2 % | Greenland |
| 2020s | 62.67 % | 62 % | 0.6667 % | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of population using at least basic sanitation services, Eswatini or Greenland?
- Eswatini, at 64 % against 62 % in Greenland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in percentage of population using at least basic sanitation services between Eswatini and Greenland?
- 2 %, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Greenland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2022.
- How do Eswatini and Greenland rank globally for percentage of population using at least basic sanitation services?
- Eswatini ranks 141st and Greenland ranks 143rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percentage of population using at least basic sanitation services (percent) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.