Djibouti vs Eswatini: Percentage of population using at least basic sanitation services
Percentage of population using at least basic sanitation services over time
- Djibouti
- Eswatini
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 67 % against 64 % in Eswatini, a difference of 3 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eswatini ahead.
Djibouti ranks 138th and Eswatini ranks 141st of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.2 % | 52.7 % | 6.5 % | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 59.9 % | 58.8 % | 1.1 % | Djibouti |
| 2020s | 67 % | 63 % | 4 % | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of population using at least basic sanitation services, Djibouti or Eswatini?
- Djibouti, at 67 % against 64 % in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in percentage of population using at least basic sanitation services between Djibouti and Eswatini?
- 3 %, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Eswatini?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Djibouti and Eswatini rank globally for percentage of population using at least basic sanitation services?
- Djibouti ranks 138th and Eswatini ranks 141st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percentage of population using at least basic sanitation services (percent) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.