Jamaica vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Per capita meat and fish consumption

Jamaica
56.79 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
62.94 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Jamaica rank
13th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
11th

Per capita meat and fish consumption over time

  • Jamaica
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
020406080196119922023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 62.94 kilograms per year per capita against 56.79 kilograms per year per capita in Jamaica, a difference of 6.15 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Jamaica ranks 13th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 11th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 5.27 kilograms per year per capita 5.52 kilograms per year per capita 0.2502 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 18.13 kilograms per year per capita 14.39 kilograms per year per capita 3.74 kilograms per year per capita Jamaica
1980s 25.54 kilograms per year per capita 30.53 kilograms per year per capita 4.99 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 34.28 kilograms per year per capita 41.19 kilograms per year per capita 6.92 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 47.48 kilograms per year per capita 50.28 kilograms per year per capita 2.79 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 53.93 kilograms per year per capita 61.1 kilograms per year per capita 7.17 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 54.86 kilograms per year per capita 67.55 kilograms per year per capita 12.69 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita meat and fish consumption, Jamaica or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 62.94 kilograms per year per capita against 56.79 kilograms per year per capita in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in per capita meat and fish consumption between Jamaica and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
6.15 kilograms per year per capita, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for per capita meat and fish consumption?
Jamaica ranks 13th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 11th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita meat and fish consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Per capita meat and fish consumption. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-type/jamaica/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-meat-type/jamaica/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Jamaica vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Per capita meat and fish consumption</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita meat and fish consumption
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.