Fiji vs Qatar: Per capita meat and fish consumption
Fiji
46.8 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Qatar
48.28 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Fiji rank
29th
Qatar rank
26th
Per capita meat and fish consumption over time
- Fiji
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 48.28 kilograms per year per capita against 46.8 kilograms per year per capita in Fiji, a difference of 1.48 kilograms per year per capita.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.
Fiji ranks 29th and Qatar ranks 26th of 191 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 39.96 kilograms per year per capita | 54.52 kilograms per year per capita | 14.56 kilograms per year per capita | Qatar |
| 2020s | 40.28 kilograms per year per capita | 53.4 kilograms per year per capita | 13.12 kilograms per year per capita | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita meat and fish consumption, Fiji or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 48.28 kilograms per year per capita against 46.8 kilograms per year per capita in Fiji as of 2023.
- What is the difference in per capita meat and fish consumption between Fiji and Qatar?
- 1.48 kilograms per year per capita, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Qatar?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Qatar rank globally for per capita meat and fish consumption?
- Fiji ranks 29th and Qatar ranks 26th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita meat and fish consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.