Montenegro vs Myanmar: Per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — Value
Per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — Value over time
- Montenegro
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 34 kcal/cap/d against 33 kcal/cap/d in Montenegro, a difference of 1 kcal/cap/d.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 57th and Myanmar ranks 55th of 147 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.6 kcal/cap/d | 27.8 kcal/cap/d | 17.8 kcal/cap/d | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 61.4 kcal/cap/d | 32.2 kcal/cap/d | 29.2 kcal/cap/d | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 25.6 kcal/cap/d | 21.6 kcal/cap/d | 4 kcal/cap/d | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — value, Montenegro or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 34 kcal/cap/d against 33 kcal/cap/d in Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — value between Montenegro and Myanmar?
- 1 kcal/cap/d, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Myanmar?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Montenegro and Myanmar rank globally for per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — value?
- Montenegro ranks 57th and Myanmar ranks 55th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.