Libya vs Mexico: Per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — Value
Per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — Value over time
- Libya
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 32 kcal/cap/d against 31 kcal/cap/d in Libya, a difference of 1 kcal/cap/d.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mexico ahead.
Libya ranks 66th and Mexico ranks 63rd of 147 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 2 and Mexico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.4 kcal/cap/d | 24.6 kcal/cap/d | 13.2 kcal/cap/d | Mexico |
| 2010s | 28.2 kcal/cap/d | 27 kcal/cap/d | 1.2 kcal/cap/d | Libya |
| 2020s | 33.6 kcal/cap/d | 18 kcal/cap/d | 15.6 kcal/cap/d | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — value, Libya or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 32 kcal/cap/d against 31 kcal/cap/d in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — value between Libya and Mexico?
- 1 kcal/cap/d, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Mexico?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Mexico rank globally for per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — value?
- Libya ranks 66th and Mexico ranks 63rd of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.