Guatemala vs Papua New Guinea: Per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — Value
Per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — Value over time
- Guatemala
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 22 kcal/cap/d against 22 kcal/cap/d in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 kcal/cap/d.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 100th and Papua New Guinea ranks 100th of 147 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.2 kcal/cap/d | 21.4 kcal/cap/d | 16.8 kcal/cap/d | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 33 kcal/cap/d | 20.5 kcal/cap/d | 12.5 kcal/cap/d | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 25.4 kcal/cap/d | 16.4 kcal/cap/d | 9 kcal/cap/d | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — value, Guatemala or Papua New Guinea?
- Guatemala, at 22 kcal/cap/d against 22 kcal/cap/d in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — value between Guatemala and Papua New Guinea?
- 0 kcal/cap/d, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Papua New Guinea?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and Papua New Guinea rank globally for per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — value?
- Guatemala ranks 100th and Papua New Guinea ranks 100th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Per capita food supply variability (kcal/cap/day) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.