Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Peas — Feed

Australia and New Zealand
52 1000 t
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
82 1000 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
15th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
14th

Peas — Feed over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
255075100125201020162023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 82 1000 t against 52 1000 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 30 1000 t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 1.6 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 15th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th of 114 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 82.1 1000 t 67.7 1000 t 14.4 1000 t Australia and New Zealand
2020s 66 1000 t 89 1000 t 23 1000 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher peas — feed, Australia and New Zealand or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 82 1000 t against 52 1000 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in peas — feed between Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
30 1000 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for peas — feed?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 15th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Peas — Feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Peas — Feed. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/peas-feed/australia-and-new-zealand/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/peas-feed/australia-and-new-zealand/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Peas — Feed</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Peas — Feed
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
155 places, 1,933 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.