Hungary vs Sao Tome and Principe: Palm kernels — Processing

Hungary
404 t
in 2013
Sao Tome and Principe
850 t
in 2013
Hungary rank
36th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
34th

Palm kernels — Processing over time

  • Hungary
  • Sao Tome and Principe
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119872013

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 850 t against 404 t in Hungary, a difference of 446 t.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 2.1 times Hungary's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 36th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 34th of 58 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 2,585 t 0.1111 t 2,585 t Hungary
1970s 634.1 t 0 t 634.1 t Hungary
1980s 0 t 25.1 t 25.1 t Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 0 t 234.2 t 234.2 t Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.7 t 667.9 t 667.2 t Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 190.25 t 807.5 t 617.25 t Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher palm kernels — processing, Hungary or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 850 t against 404 t in Hungary as of 2013.
What is the difference in palm kernels — processing between Hungary and Sao Tome and Principe?
446 t, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Sao Tome and Principe?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Hungary and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for palm kernels — processing?
Hungary ranks 36th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 34th of 58 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Palm kernels — Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Sao Tome and Principe: Palm kernels — Processing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/palm-kernels-processing/hungary/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/palm-kernels-processing/hungary/sao-tome-and-principe/">Hungary vs Sao Tome and Principe: Palm kernels — Processing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Palm kernels — Processing
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
81 places, 4,175 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.