C�te d'Ivoire vs Ecuador: Palm kernels — Domestic supply quantity

C�te d'Ivoire
99,000 t
in 2013
Ecuador
107,162 t
in 2013
C�te d'Ivoire rank
9th
Ecuador rank
7th

Palm kernels — Domestic supply quantity over time

  • C�te d'Ivoire
  • Ecuador
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k196119872013

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 107,162 t against 99,000 t in C�te d'Ivoire, a difference of 8,162 t.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times C�te d'Ivoire's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

C�te d'Ivoire ranks 9th and Ecuador ranks 7th of 119 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, C�te d'Ivoire averaged higher in 3 and Ecuador in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade C�te d'Ivoire Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 2,510 t 6,367 t 3,856 t Ecuador
1970s 8,175 t 4,777 t 3,398 t C�te d'Ivoire
1980s 29,992 t 14,794 t 15,198 t C�te d'Ivoire
1990s 34,542 t 31,463 t 3,079 t C�te d'Ivoire
2000s 45,360 t 66,546 t 21,186 t Ecuador
2010s 94,250 t 100,290 t 6,040 t Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher palm kernels — domestic supply quantity, C�te d'Ivoire or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 107,162 t against 99,000 t in C�te d'Ivoire as of 2013.
What is the difference in palm kernels — domestic supply quantity between C�te d'Ivoire and Ecuador?
8,162 t, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for C�te d'Ivoire and Ecuador?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do C�te d'Ivoire and Ecuador rank globally for palm kernels — domestic supply quantity?
C�te d'Ivoire ranks 9th and Ecuador ranks 7th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Palm kernels — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

C�te d'Ivoire vs Ecuador: Palm kernels — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/palm-kernels-domestic-supply-quantity/c-te-d-ivoire/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/palm-kernels-domestic-supply-quantity/c-te-d-ivoire/ecuador/">C�te d'Ivoire vs Ecuador: Palm kernels — Domestic supply quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Palm kernels — Domestic supply quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
156 places, 7,784 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.