China, Hong Kong SAR vs Eswatini: Oranges — Terms of trade

China, Hong Kong SAR
91.23 %
in 2024
Eswatini
92.96 %
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
60th
Eswatini rank
57th

Oranges — Terms of trade over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Eswatini
050100150201020172024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 92.96 % against 91.23 % in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 1.73 %.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 60th and Eswatini ranks 57th of 91 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Eswatini Difference Ahead
2010s 89.58 % 108.25 % 18.67 % Eswatini
2020s 88.41 % 90.64 % 2.24 % Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oranges — terms of trade, China, Hong Kong SAR or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 92.96 % against 91.23 % in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
What is the difference in oranges — terms of trade between China, Hong Kong SAR and Eswatini?
1.73 %, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Eswatini?
10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Eswatini rank globally for oranges — terms of trade?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 60th and Eswatini ranks 57th of 91 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Oranges — Terms of trade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Eswatini: Oranges — Terms of trade. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-terms-of-trade/china-hong-kong-sar/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-terms-of-trade/china-hong-kong-sar/eswatini/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Eswatini: Oranges — Terms of trade</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Oranges — Terms of trade
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
99 places, 1,365 data points, 2010–2024
Last refreshed

The food and agricultural trade indicators dataset is based on trade, production and gross domestic product (GDP) data. Agri-food trade data are collected, processed and disseminated by FAO according to the standard International Merchandise Trade Statistics (IMTS) Methodology. The data is mainly provided by UNSD, Eurostat, and other national authorities as needed. The source data is checked for outliers, trade partner data is used for non-reporting countries or missing cells, and data on food aid is added to take total cross-border trade flows into account. The trade database includes the following variables: export quantity, export value, import quantity, and import value. It includes all food and agricultural products imported/exported annually by all countries in the world. Production data details are available at https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL and GDP data details are available at https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/MK