Japan vs Small island developing states: Oilcrops — Losses

Japan
65,834 t
in 2013
Small island developing states
83,821 t
in 2013
Japan rank
25th
Small island developing states rank
11th

Oilcrops — Losses over time

  • Japan
  • Small island developing states
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119872013

How they compare

Small island developing states currently reports 83,821 t against 65,834 t in Japan, a difference of 17,987 t.

That makes Small island developing states's figure about 1.3 times Japan's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Small island developing states ahead.

Japan ranks 25th and Small island developing states ranks 11th of 147 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 3 and Small island developing states in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Small island developing states Difference Ahead
1960s 13,962 t 41,436 t 27,475 t Small island developing states
1970s 25,568 t 45,858 t 20,290 t Small island developing states
1980s 83,227 t 54,478 t 28,749 t Japan
1990s 124,960 t 50,686 t 74,274 t Japan
2000s 111,854 t 65,730 t 46,124 t Japan
2010s 70,902 t 78,225 t 7,323 t Small island developing states

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oilcrops — losses, Japan or Small island developing states?
Small island developing states, at 83,821 t against 65,834 t in Japan as of 2013.
What is the difference in oilcrops — losses between Japan and Small island developing states?
17,987 t, with Small island developing states ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Small island developing states?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Japan and Small island developing states rank globally for oilcrops — losses?
Japan ranks 25th and Small island developing states ranks 11th of 147 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Oilcrops — Losses. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Small island developing states: Oilcrops — Losses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oilcrops-losses/japan/small-island-developing-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oilcrops-losses/japan/small-island-developing-states/">Japan vs Small island developing states: Oilcrops — Losses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Oilcrops — Losses
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
190 places, 9,211 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.