Northern Europe vs Zimbabwe: Offals — Losses
Offals — Losses over time
- Northern Europe
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Northern Europe currently reports 35 1000 t against 10 1000 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 25 1000 t.
That makes Northern Europe's figure about 3.5 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Northern Europe has been ahead every year.
Northern Europe ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 10 groups.
Northern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern Europe | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 22.2 1000 t | 1.9 1000 t | 20.3 1000 t | Northern Europe |
| 2020s | 35 1000 t | 9.25 1000 t | 25.75 1000 t | Northern Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher offals — losses, Northern Europe or Zimbabwe?
- Northern Europe, at 35 1000 t against 10 1000 t in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in offals — losses between Northern Europe and Zimbabwe?
- 25 1000 t, with Northern Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Europe and Zimbabwe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Northern Europe and Zimbabwe rank globally for offals — losses?
- Northern Europe ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 10 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Offals — Losses. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.