Northern America vs Uruguay: Offals — Feed
Offals — Feed over time
- Northern America
- Uruguay
How they compare
Northern America currently reports 769 1000 t against 4 1000 t in Uruguay, a difference of 765 1000 t.
That makes Northern America's figure about 192.2 times Uruguay's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Northern America has been ahead every year.
Northern America ranks 3rd and Uruguay ranks 5th of 23 groups.
Northern America has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern America | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 757.9 1000 t | 31.2 1000 t | 726.7 1000 t | Northern America |
| 2020s | 831.75 1000 t | 4.5 1000 t | 827.25 1000 t | Northern America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher offals — feed, Northern America or Uruguay?
- Northern America, at 769 1000 t against 4 1000 t in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in offals — feed between Northern America and Uruguay?
- 765 1000 t, with Northern America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern America and Uruguay?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Northern America and Uruguay rank globally for offals — feed?
- Northern America ranks 3rd and Uruguay ranks 5th of 23 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Offals — Feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.