Belarus vs North Macedonia: Minimum dietary energy requirement (kcal/cap/day) — Value
Minimum dietary energy requirement (kcal/cap/day) — Value over time
- Belarus
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 1,917 kcal/cap/d against 1,912 kcal/cap/d in Belarus, a difference of 5 kcal/cap/d.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 52nd and North Macedonia ranks 49th of 181 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,924 kcal/cap/d | 1,912 kcal/cap/d | 11.6 kcal/cap/d | Belarus |
| 2010s | 1,909 kcal/cap/d | 1,920 kcal/cap/d | 10.5 kcal/cap/d | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 1,905 kcal/cap/d | 1,914 kcal/cap/d | 9.17 kcal/cap/d | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher minimum dietary energy requirement (kcal/cap/day) — value, Belarus or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 1,917 kcal/cap/d against 1,912 kcal/cap/d in Belarus as of 2025.
- What is the difference in minimum dietary energy requirement (kcal/cap/day) — value between Belarus and North Macedonia?
- 5 kcal/cap/d, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and North Macedonia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and North Macedonia rank globally for minimum dietary energy requirement (kcal/cap/day) — value?
- Belarus ranks 52nd and North Macedonia ranks 49th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Minimum dietary energy requirement (kcal/cap/day) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.