Latvia vs Mauritius: Meat, Total — Production, per capita
Latvia
0.0486 t per person
in 2024
Mauritius
0.0439 t per person
in 2024
Latvia rank
57th
Mauritius rank
59th
Meat, Total — Production, per capita over time
- Latvia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0486 t per person against 0.0439 t per person in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0047 t per person.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 57th and Mauritius ranks 59th of 171 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0487 t per person | 0.0208 t per person | 0.0279 t per person | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.0331 t per person | 0.0311 t per person | 0.002 t per person | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0428 t per person | 0.0406 t per person | 0.0022 t per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.0481 t per person | 0.0445 t per person | 0.0036 t per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat, total — production, per capita, Latvia or Mauritius?
- Latvia, at 0.0486 t per person against 0.0439 t per person in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in meat, total — production, per capita between Latvia and Mauritius?
- 0.0047 t per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mauritius?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Mauritius rank globally for meat, total — production, per capita?
- Latvia ranks 57th and Mauritius ranks 59th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat, Total — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Meat, Total — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.