Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs New Zealand: Meat of sheep, fresh: Gross Production Value (constant) … I constant
Meat of sheep, fresh: Gross Production Value (constant) … I constant over time
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- New Zealand
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 8.50 million 1000 Int$ against 2.10 million 1000 Int$ in New Zealand, a difference of 6.40 million 1000 Int$.
That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 4.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 7th and New Zealand ranks 10th of 30 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 4 and New Zealand in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.66 million 1000 Int$ | 2.31 million 1000 Int$ | 650,472 1000 Int$ | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 2.04 million 1000 Int$ | 2.46 million 1000 Int$ | 412,336 1000 Int$ | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 2.57 million 1000 Int$ | 2.96 million 1000 Int$ | 391,271 1000 Int$ | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 3.21 million 1000 Int$ | 2.45 million 1000 Int$ | 764,342 1000 Int$ | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 4.94 million 1000 Int$ | 2.55 million 1000 Int$ | 2.40 million 1000 Int$ | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 6.60 million 1000 Int$ | 2.19 million 1000 Int$ | 4.41 million 1000 Int$ | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 8.06 million 1000 Int$ | 2.06 million 1000 Int$ | 6.00 million 1000 Int$ | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or New Zealand?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 8.50 million 1000 Int$ against 2.10 million 1000 Int$ in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and New Zealand?
- 6.40 million 1000 Int$, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and New Zealand?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and New Zealand rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 7th and New Zealand ranks 10th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.