Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mauritius: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value

Bosnia and Herzegovina
-100 % change on previous year
in 2019
Mauritius
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
185th
Mauritius rank
185th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Mauritius
-1000100200300400196219902019

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Mauritius, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Mauritius ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 185th and Mauritius ranks 185th of 194 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s -58.77 % change on previous year 6.45 % change on previous year 65.23 % change on previous year Mauritius
2000s 8.26 % change on previous year -16.48 % change on previous year 24.74 % change on previous year Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s -4.98 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 95.02 % change on previous year Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Mauritius?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Mauritius as of 2019.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mauritius?
0 % change on previous year, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mauritius?
11 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2014.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mauritius rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 185th and Mauritius ranks 185th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mauritius: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-7/bosnia-and-herzegovina/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-7/bosnia-and-herzegovina/mauritius/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mauritius: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 12,074 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.