Bahamas vs Singapore: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value

Bahamas
-85.16 % change on previous year
in 2024
Singapore
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Bahamas rank
184th
Singapore rank
185th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value over time

  • Bahamas
  • Singapore
-2000200400600800196219932024

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports -85.16 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Singapore, a difference of 14.84 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 184th and Singapore ranks 185th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Singapore Difference Ahead
1970s -7.84 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 92.16 % change on previous year Bahamas
1980s -7.3 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 92.7 % change on previous year Bahamas
2010s 0.5584 % change on previous year -15.9 % change on previous year 16.46 % change on previous year Bahamas
2020s -18.35 % change on previous year 104.74 % change on previous year 123.1 % change on previous year Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, Bahamas or Singapore?
Bahamas, at -85.16 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Singapore as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between Bahamas and Singapore?
14.84 % change on previous year, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Singapore?
14 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2024.
How do Bahamas and Singapore rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?
Bahamas ranks 184th and Singapore ranks 185th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Singapore: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-7/bahamas-the/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-7/bahamas-the/singapore/">Bahamas vs Singapore: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 12,074 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.