Bahamas vs Eswatini: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value

Bahamas
-85.16 % change on previous year
in 2024
Eswatini
-100 % change on previous year
in 2007
Bahamas rank
184th
Eswatini rank
185th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value over time

  • Bahamas
  • Eswatini
-1000100200300196219932024

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports -85.16 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Eswatini, a difference of 14.84 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 25 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Eswatini ahead.

Bahamas ranks 184th and Eswatini ranks 185th of 194 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s -1.9 % change on previous year 51.24 % change on previous year 53.13 % change on previous year Eswatini
1970s -6.12 % change on previous year -2.23 % change on previous year 3.88 % change on previous year Eswatini
1980s -4.04 % change on previous year -4.27 % change on previous year 0.2308 % change on previous year Bahamas
1990s -2.93 % change on previous year -14.17 % change on previous year 11.24 % change on previous year Bahamas
2000s 23.65 % change on previous year -17.4 % change on previous year 41.05 % change on previous year Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, Bahamas or Eswatini?
Bahamas, at -85.16 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Eswatini as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between Bahamas and Eswatini?
14.84 % change on previous year, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Eswatini?
44 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2007.
How do Bahamas and Eswatini rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?
Bahamas ranks 184th and Eswatini ranks 185th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Eswatini: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-7/bahamas-the/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-7/bahamas-the/eswatini/">Bahamas vs Eswatini: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 12,074 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.