Rwanda vs Sierra Leone: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value

Rwanda
0.0008 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Sierra Leone
0.001 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Rwanda rank
106th
Sierra Leone rank
103rd

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value over time

  • Rwanda
  • Sierra Leone
0.0010.0010.0020.0020.003196119922024

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 0.001 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0008 1000 Int$ per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 106th and Sierra Leone ranks 103rd of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 3 and Sierra Leone in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0008 1000 Int$ per person 0.0007 1000 Int$ per person 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person Rwanda
1970s 0.0007 1000 Int$ per person 0.0008 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person Sierra Leone
1980s 0.0007 1000 Int$ per person 0.0008 1000 Int$ per person 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person Sierra Leone
1990s 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person 0.0007 1000 Int$ per person 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person Sierra Leone
2000s 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person Rwanda
2010s 0.0023 1000 Int$ per person 0.0013 1000 Int$ per person 0.001 1000 Int$ per person Rwanda
2020s 0.001 1000 Int$ per person 0.001 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, Rwanda or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 0.001 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0008 1000 Int$ per person in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between Rwanda and Sierra Leone?
0.0002 1000 Int$ per person, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sierra Leone?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Rwanda and Sierra Leone rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?
Rwanda ranks 106th and Sierra Leone ranks 103rd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Sierra Leone: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-4/rwanda/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-4/rwanda/sierra-leone/">Rwanda vs Sierra Leone: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,985 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.