Australia and New Zealand vs Tunisia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita

Australia and New Zealand
102.41
in 2024
Tunisia
102.89
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
66th
Tunisia rank
64th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Tunisia
50100150200196119922024

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 102.89 against 102.41 in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.48.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 66th and Tunisia ranks 64th of 166 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 4 and Tunisia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 188.1 121.93 66.17 Australia and New Zealand
1970s 166.36 97.56 68.8 Australia and New Zealand
1980s 147.32 103.93 43.39 Australia and New Zealand
1990s 126.38 113.93 12.45 Australia and New Zealand
2000s 115.6 121.78 6.19 Tunisia
2010s 94.12 102.4 8.28 Tunisia
2020s 91 109.6 18.6 Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross per capita, Australia and New Zealand or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 102.89 against 102.41 in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross per capita between Australia and New Zealand and Tunisia?
0.48, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Tunisia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Tunisia rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross per capita?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 66th and Tunisia ranks 64th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Tunisia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-per-capita-production-index-number-2014/australia-and-new-zealand/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-per-capita-production-index-number-2014/australia-and-new-zealand/tunisia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Tunisia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
211 places, 12,100 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.