Equatorial Guinea vs Lebanon: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Equatorial Guinea
0.0002 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Lebanon
0.0003 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
133rd
Lebanon rank
131st

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Lebanon
00.0010.0020.003196119922024

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.3 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 133rd and Lebanon ranks 131st of 150 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Lebanon in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Lebanon Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person 0.0004 1000 Int$ per person 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person 0.0012 1000 Int$ per person 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person Lebanon
1990s 0.0004 1000 Int$ per person 0.002 1000 Int$ per person 0.0015 1000 Int$ per person Lebanon
2000s 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person Lebanon
2010s 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person Lebanon
2020s 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person Lebanon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Equatorial Guinea or Lebanon?
Lebanon, at 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Equatorial Guinea and Lebanon?
0.0001 1000 Int$ per person, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Lebanon?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Lebanon rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 133rd and Lebanon ranks 131st of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Lebanon: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/equatorial-guinea/lebanon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/equatorial-guinea/lebanon/">Equatorial Guinea vs Lebanon: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,556 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.