Chad vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Chad
0.0003 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
0.0002 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Chad rank
132nd
Equatorial Guinea rank
133rd

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Chad
  • Equatorial Guinea
0000.0010.001196119922024

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.3 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 56 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Chad ranks 132nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 133rd of 150 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person 0.0004 1000 Int$ per person 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person Chad
2020s 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Chad or Equatorial Guinea?
Chad, at 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Chad and Equatorial Guinea?
0.0001 1000 Int$ per person, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Equatorial Guinea?
56 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Chad and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Chad ranks 132nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 133rd of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/chad/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/chad/equatorial-guinea/">Chad vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,556 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.