Equatorial Guinea vs Thailand: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value

Equatorial Guinea
0.0001 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Thailand
0.0001 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
124th
Thailand rank
123rd

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Thailand
00000196119922024

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 124th and Thailand ranks 123rd of 146 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.0004 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0004 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person 0.0004 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0004 1000 Int$ per person 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, Equatorial Guinea or Thailand?
Thailand, at 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between Equatorial Guinea and Thailand?
0 1000 Int$ per person, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Thailand?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Thailand rank globally for meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 124th and Thailand ranks 123rd of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Thailand: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-4/equatorial-guinea/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-4/equatorial-guinea/thailand/">Equatorial Guinea vs Thailand: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 8,455 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.