Mauritius vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per

Mauritius
0.0017 t per person
in 2024
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
0.0015 t per person
in 2024
Mauritius rank
126th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
129th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per over time

  • Mauritius
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
0.0010.0020.0030.004196119922024

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.0017 t per person against 0.0015 t per person in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.0002 t per person.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 126th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 129th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0028 t per person 0.0029 t per person 0 t per person Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1970s 0.0016 t per person 0.0026 t per person 0.001 t per person Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1980s 0.0014 t per person 0.0025 t per person 0.0011 t per person Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1990s 0.0023 t per person 0.002 t per person 0.0003 t per person Mauritius
2000s 0.0022 t per person 0.0017 t per person 0.0005 t per person Mauritius
2010s 0.0017 t per person 0.0019 t per person 0.0002 t per person Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2020s 0.0016 t per person 0.0018 t per person 0.0003 t per person Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per, Mauritius or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Mauritius, at 0.0017 t per person against 0.0015 t per person in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per between Mauritius and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
0.0002 t per person, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Mauritius and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per?
Mauritius ranks 126th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 129th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production-per-capita/mauritius/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production-per-capita/mauritius/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Mauritius vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,723 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.