New Zealand vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

New Zealand
0.4458 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Uruguay
0.5331 1000 USD per person
in 2024
New Zealand rank
3rd
Uruguay rank
2nd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • New Zealand
  • Uruguay
00.20.40.6196119922024

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0.5331 1000 USD per person against 0.4458 1000 USD per person in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0873 1000 USD per person.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

New Zealand ranks 3rd and Uruguay ranks 2nd of 122 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 5 and Uruguay in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3584 1000 USD per person 0.3497 1000 USD per person 0.0087 1000 USD per person New Zealand
1970s 0.5056 1000 USD per person 0.3551 1000 USD per person 0.1505 1000 USD per person New Zealand
1980s 0.503 1000 USD per person 0.3612 1000 USD per person 0.1418 1000 USD per person New Zealand
1990s 0.5014 1000 USD per person 0.3687 1000 USD per person 0.1327 1000 USD per person New Zealand
2000s 0.4895 1000 USD per person 0.4593 1000 USD per person 0.0302 1000 USD per person New Zealand
2010s 0.4477 1000 USD per person 0.5012 1000 USD per person 0.0535 1000 USD per person Uruguay
2020s 0.4557 1000 USD per person 0.5298 1000 USD per person 0.0741 1000 USD per person Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, New Zealand or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 0.5331 1000 USD per person against 0.4458 1000 USD per person in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between New Zealand and Uruguay?
0.0873 1000 USD per person, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Uruguay?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do New Zealand and Uruguay rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
New Zealand ranks 3rd and Uruguay ranks 2nd of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/new-zealand/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/new-zealand/uruguay/">New Zealand vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit
1000 USD per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,765 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.