How many years of comparable data are there for India and Sri Lanka?

30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

India vs Sri Lanka: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

India

0.0008 1000 USD per person

in 1990

Sri Lanka

0.0015 1000 USD per person

in 2024

India rank

116th

Sri Lanka rank

115th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

India
Sri Lanka

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0.0015 1000 USD per person against 0.0008 1000 USD per person in India, a difference of 0.0007 1000 USD per person.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.9 times India's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

India ranks 116th and Sri Lanka ranks 115th of 122 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	India	Sri Lanka	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0007 1000 USD per person	0.0043 1000 USD per person	0.0036 1000 USD per person	Sri Lanka
1970s	0.0007 1000 USD per person	0.0036 1000 USD per person	0.0029 1000 USD per person	Sri Lanka
1980s	0.0008 1000 USD per person	0.0025 1000 USD per person	0.0017 1000 USD per person	Sri Lanka
1990s	0.0008 1000 USD per person	0.0019 1000 USD per person	0.0012 1000 USD per person	Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, India or Sri Lanka?: Sri Lanka, at 0.0015 1000 USD per person against 0.0008 1000 USD per person in India as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between India and Sri Lanka?: 0.0007 1000 USD per person, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Sri Lanka?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
How do India and Sri Lanka rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: India ranks 116th and Sri Lanka ranks 115th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Sri Lanka: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/india/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/india/sri-lanka/">India vs Sri Lanka: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,765 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.