Guinea-Bissau vs Jordan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Guinea-Bissau
0.0205 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Jordan
0.0199 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau rank
54th
Jordan rank
57th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Jordan
00.010.020.03196119922024

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.0205 1000 USD per person against 0.0199 1000 USD per person in Jordan, a difference of 0.0006 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 54th and Jordan ranks 57th of 122 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 6 and Jordan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Jordan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0177 1000 USD per person 0.0082 1000 USD per person 0.0095 1000 USD per person Guinea-Bissau
1970s 0.0174 1000 USD per person 0.0062 1000 USD per person 0.0112 1000 USD per person Guinea-Bissau
1980s 0.0163 1000 USD per person 0.003 1000 USD per person 0.0133 1000 USD per person Guinea-Bissau
1990s 0.0201 1000 USD per person 0.0027 1000 USD per person 0.0174 1000 USD per person Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.0217 1000 USD per person 0.0067 1000 USD per person 0.015 1000 USD per person Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.0217 1000 USD per person 0.0124 1000 USD per person 0.0094 1000 USD per person Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.0211 1000 USD per person 0.0292 1000 USD per person 0.0081 1000 USD per person Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Guinea-Bissau or Jordan?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0.0205 1000 USD per person against 0.0199 1000 USD per person in Jordan as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Guinea-Bissau and Jordan?
0.0006 1000 USD per person, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Jordan?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Jordan rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 54th and Jordan ranks 57th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Jordan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/guinea-bissau/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/guinea-bissau/jordan/">Guinea-Bissau vs Jordan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit
1000 USD per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,765 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.