Equatorial Guinea vs India: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Equatorial Guinea
0.0003 1000 USD per person
in 2024
India
0.0008 1000 USD per person
in 1990
Equatorial Guinea rank
118th
India rank
116th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • India
00.0010.0010.002196119922024

How they compare

India currently reports 0.0008 1000 USD per person against 0.0003 1000 USD per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0005 1000 USD per person.

That makes India's figure about 2.3 times Equatorial Guinea's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 118th and India ranks 116th of 122 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea India Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0011 1000 USD per person 0.0007 1000 USD per person 0.0004 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.0014 1000 USD per person 0.0007 1000 USD per person 0.0007 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0014 1000 USD per person 0.0008 1000 USD per person 0.0006 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0012 1000 USD per person 0.0008 1000 USD per person 0.0004 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Equatorial Guinea or India?
India, at 0.0008 1000 USD per person against 0.0003 1000 USD per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 1990.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Equatorial Guinea and India?
0.0005 1000 USD per person, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and India?
30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
How do Equatorial Guinea and India rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 118th and India ranks 116th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs India: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/equatorial-guinea/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/equatorial-guinea/india/">Equatorial Guinea vs India: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit
1000 USD per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,765 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.