How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Guinea-Bissau?

20 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Czechia vs Guinea-Bissau: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Czechia

0.0203 1000 USD per person

in 2017

Guinea-Bissau

0.0205 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Czechia rank

55th

Guinea-Bissau rank

54th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Czechia
Guinea-Bissau

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.0205 1000 USD per person against 0.0203 1000 USD per person in Czechia, a difference of 0.0002 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 55th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 54th of 122 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Guinea-Bissau in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Czechia	Guinea-Bissau	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0393 1000 USD per person	0.0205 1000 USD per person	0.0188 1000 USD per person	Czechia
2000s	0.0286 1000 USD per person	0.0217 1000 USD per person	0.0069 1000 USD per person	Czechia
2010s	0.0208 1000 USD per person	0.0219 1000 USD per person	0.0011 1000 USD per person	Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Czechia or Guinea-Bissau?: Guinea-Bissau, at 0.0205 1000 USD per person against 0.0203 1000 USD per person in Czechia as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Czechia and Guinea-Bissau?: 0.0002 1000 USD per person, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Guinea-Bissau?: 20 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2017.
How do Czechia and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Czechia ranks 55th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 54th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Guinea-Bissau: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/czechia/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/czechia/guinea-bissau/">Czechia vs Guinea-Bissau: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,765 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.