How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Nepal?

30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Burundi vs Nepal: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Burundi

0.0044 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Nepal

0.0056 1000 USD per person

in 1990

Burundi rank

100th

Nepal rank

99th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Burundi
Nepal

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0.0056 1000 USD per person against 0.0044 1000 USD per person in Burundi, a difference of 0.0012 1000 USD per person.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.3 times Burundi's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Burundi has been ahead every year.

Burundi ranks 100th and Nepal ranks 99th of 122 countries.

Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Burundi	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0083 1000 USD per person	0.0064 1000 USD per person	0.0019 1000 USD per person	Burundi
1970s	0.0107 1000 USD per person	0.0069 1000 USD per person	0.0038 1000 USD per person	Burundi
1980s	0.008 1000 USD per person	0.0064 1000 USD per person	0.0016 1000 USD per person	Burundi
1990s	0.0069 1000 USD per person	0.0056 1000 USD per person	0.0013 1000 USD per person	Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Burundi or Nepal?: Nepal, at 0.0056 1000 USD per person against 0.0044 1000 USD per person in Burundi as of 1990.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Burundi and Nepal?: 0.0012 1000 USD per person, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Nepal?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
How do Burundi and Nepal rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Burundi ranks 100th and Nepal ranks 99th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Nepal: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/burundi/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/burundi/nepal/">Burundi vs Nepal: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,765 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.