How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and India?

30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bangladesh vs India: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Bangladesh

0.0015 1000 USD per person

in 2024

India

0.0008 1000 USD per person

in 1990

Bangladesh rank

114th

India rank

116th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Bangladesh
India

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 0.0015 1000 USD per person against 0.0008 1000 USD per person in India, a difference of 0.0007 1000 USD per person.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.9 times India's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 114th and India ranks 116th of 122 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bangladesh	India	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0027 1000 USD per person	0.0007 1000 USD per person	0.002 1000 USD per person	Bangladesh
1970s	0.0024 1000 USD per person	0.0007 1000 USD per person	0.0017 1000 USD per person	Bangladesh
1980s	0.0017 1000 USD per person	0.0008 1000 USD per person	0.0009 1000 USD per person	Bangladesh
1990s	0.0016 1000 USD per person	0.0008 1000 USD per person	0.0008 1000 USD per person	Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Bangladesh or India?: Bangladesh, at 0.0015 1000 USD per person against 0.0008 1000 USD per person in India as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Bangladesh and India?: 0.0007 1000 USD per person, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and India?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
How do Bangladesh and India rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Bangladesh ranks 114th and India ranks 116th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs India: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/bangladesh/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/bangladesh/india/">Bangladesh vs India: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,765 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.