Australia and New Zealand vs Northern Europe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Northern Europe
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 11.83 % change on previous year against 1.36 % change on previous year in Northern Europe, a difference of 10.47 % change on previous year.
That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 8.7 times Northern Europe's.
The two have swapped places 26 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 17th and Northern Europe ranks 16th of 209 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 6 and Northern Europe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Northern Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.41 % change on previous year | 1.76 % change on previous year | 3.65 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1970s | 7.3 % change on previous year | 3.34 % change on previous year | 3.96 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1980s | -1.69 % change on previous year | -0.2468 % change on previous year | 1.44 % change on previous year | Northern Europe |
| 1990s | 2.31 % change on previous year | 0.2463 % change on previous year | 2.07 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2000s | 0.7174 % change on previous year | -0.3782 % change on previous year | 1.1 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2010s | 1.6 % change on previous year | 1.08 % change on previous year | 0.5169 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2020s | 1.62 % change on previous year | -0.2164 % change on previous year | 1.83 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Australia and New Zealand or Northern Europe?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 11.83 % change on previous year against 1.36 % change on previous year in Northern Europe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Australia and New Zealand and Northern Europe?
- 10.47 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Northern Europe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Northern Europe rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 17th and Northern Europe ranks 16th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.