Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 11.83 % change on previous year against 2.4 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 9.43 % change on previous year.
That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 4.9 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 30 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 17th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th of 209 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.41 % change on previous year | 2.93 % change on previous year | 2.48 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1970s | 7.3 % change on previous year | 2.31 % change on previous year | 4.99 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1980s | -1.69 % change on previous year | 1.4 % change on previous year | 3.1 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 2.31 % change on previous year | 5.57 % change on previous year | 3.26 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 0.7174 % change on previous year | 1 % change on previous year | 0.2844 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 1.6 % change on previous year | 4.38 % change on previous year | 2.79 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 1.62 % change on previous year | 1.99 % change on previous year | 0.3703 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Australia and New Zealand or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 11.83 % change on previous year against 2.4 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 9.43 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 17th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.