Saint Lucia vs Suriname: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Saint Lucia
0.0094 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Suriname
0.0101 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Saint Lucia rank
110th
Suriname rank
109th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Saint Lucia
  • Suriname
00.010.020.03196119922024

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.0101 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0094 1000 Int$ per person in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.0007 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Saint Lucia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Lucia ahead.

Saint Lucia ranks 110th and Suriname ranks 109th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Saint Lucia averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Lucia Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0137 1000 Int$ per person 0.0117 1000 Int$ per person 0.002 1000 Int$ per person Saint Lucia
1970s 0.0162 1000 Int$ per person 0.0103 1000 Int$ per person 0.0059 1000 Int$ per person Saint Lucia
1980s 0.0179 1000 Int$ per person 0.0155 1000 Int$ per person 0.0025 1000 Int$ per person Saint Lucia
1990s 0.0159 1000 Int$ per person 0.0217 1000 Int$ per person 0.0058 1000 Int$ per person Suriname
2000s 0.0112 1000 Int$ per person 0.014 1000 Int$ per person 0.0028 1000 Int$ per person Suriname
2010s 0.0107 1000 Int$ per person 0.0131 1000 Int$ per person 0.0024 1000 Int$ per person Suriname
2020s 0.0077 1000 Int$ per person 0.0117 1000 Int$ per person 0.004 1000 Int$ per person Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Saint Lucia or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.0101 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0094 1000 Int$ per person in Saint Lucia as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Saint Lucia and Suriname?
0.0007 1000 Int$ per person, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Suriname?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Saint Lucia and Suriname rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Saint Lucia ranks 110th and Suriname ranks 109th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Lucia vs Suriname: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/st-lucia/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/st-lucia/suriname/">Saint Lucia vs Suriname: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,460 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.